Corin Moss dijo: > > Hi Guys, > > I think the thing to remember here is that it's the Disk Cache > implementation that has this behaviour, and that it's very easy to use a > different store type if the user feels it's necessary. There are other, > "safer" store implementations we can use - the only problem in this case > is that the index is kept in memory (which is what makes it so fast.) > If the user decides that this is inappropriate for them, the change to a > different store type is very easy to make within the config. > > I think that moving to a filesystem store would be counter-productive, > as the thing that JCS provides is total flexibility of store type.
I totally agree with you. JCS is the way to go. I read the docos and it is a good piece on the Cocoon cake, even if we will never had in mind to repleace jisp. JCS is the right tool for these job too. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
