Geoff Howard dijo: > Ok, I think this bears bringing this issue up in a new thread (so people > notice it). The point I take out of this is that JCS makes it explicit > that successful persistence is not currently guaranteed (at least in the > default better-performing configuration). For all we know, this may > have been the case with JISP too but just not explicit. I don't know if > people have used our Cache as a persistence layer for application data. > I would not have recommended it before, and definitely would not now if > we go to JCS. I'm comfortable with this.
BTW, OJB can uses JCS too: http://db.apache.org/ojb/objectcache.html Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
