Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute on in status.xml
Bertrand Delacretaz
Tue, 09 Mar 2004 05:54:48 -0800
Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, � 14:50 Europe/Zurich, Juan Jose Pablos a �crit :
...What about impact instead of importance?
I was thinking about it actually, "impact" seems more appropriate. But this is not terribly important.
-Bertrand
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
Re: Doc about important changes
Antonio Gallardo
Re: Doc about important changes
Vadim Gritsenko
[Vote] new "importance" attribute on in stat...
Sylvain Wallez
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Sylvain Wallez
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Vadim Gritsenko
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Sylvain Wallez
Re: [Vote] new "importance" att...
Vadim Gritsenko
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Geoff Howard
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Bertrand Delacretaz
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Juan Jose Pablos
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Bertrand Delacretaz
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Sylvain Wallez
Re: [Vote] new "importance" att...
Juan Jose Pablos
Re: [Vote] new "importance"...
Joerg Heinicke
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Daniel Fagerstrom
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Reinhard P�tz
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Tim Larson
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Sylvain Wallez
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribu...
Juan Jose Pablos
Re: [Vote] new "importance" attribute o...
Joerg Heinicke
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
dev - all messages
dev - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message