On 09.03.2004 14:14, Sylvain Wallez wrote:

- do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on <action> in changes.xml?

+1 @importance or @impact


- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?

+0


Vadim wrote:

* Do you want to add a block="name" attribute on <action> in changes.xml?

+0.5 I prefer this about the above one.


Reinhard wrote:

I think high|low|medium should me more meaningful or in other words self-explaining. What about "newFeature", "incompatibleChange", "minorChange"?

-0.5 to special IMO.


Cheche wrote:

Given that, why do not use the already priority attribue that has been used on <actions>, but instead of the actions elements, move it to the child element <action>?

+0.5 also a good alternative, but @priority give a bit another attitude than @impact/@importance.


Hope I did not miss any suggestion :)

Joerg

Reply via email to