On 09.03.2004 19:48, Tim Larson wrote:
To summarize, I am changing my vote to:
-1 for locking woody via permissions or CVS (vote, not veto, of course)
+1 for freezing woody except for documentation clarification, security updates, and small bugfixes. (freeze via policy, not permissions)
I do not want to maintain two versions (even only for small bugfixes).
Me neither.
I say we incorporate changes IF and ONLY IF there is a major security hole in the woody block. Otherwise, it's is to be considered like the skin layer that a snake leaves behind when it grows.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
