...Why would we tell our users to "eat bugs" until they are ready to do a
full migration? Why could we not do minor (from an architectural
standpoint, but not necessarily from the user's view) bug fixes while
we are still holding the block? I just don't get the point of this....
IMO the problem in keeping both the woody and forms block "alive" is to make sure all fixes made to woody are made to forms as well. We already have two codebases (2.1 and 2.2) to keep in sync "manually", all this consumes energy.
If someone's willing to take care of this for any woody block changes that they think are required , fine. But it will become harder and harder as time goes by, so the sooner we can freeze or remove the woody block, the easier it will be.
-Bertrand
