Torsten Curdt wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Unico Hommes wrote: > > > > > >>I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the > >>other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to > accomplish > >>I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do some > research as to > >>what would be involved to change the build system to > accomodate this. > >> > > > > But this then makes removing xsp more difficult :) I really think > > we should keep all xsp related stuff in one place. This makes the > > whole thing easier to handle but also is more transparent for > > users. They have one single place to look for logicsheets. > > Hm... I think it's hard to classify... > > Do you also want to move the e.g. ESQL logicsheet into > the XSP block? IMO that would not be a good idea.
True...hmm...ok, then whoever does it should decide :) Carsten
