Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the
other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish
I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do some
research as to
what would be involved to change the build system to
accomodate this.
But this then makes removing xsp more difficult :) I really think
we should keep all xsp related stuff in one place. This makes the
whole thing easier to handle but also is more transparent for
users. They have one single place to look for logicsheets.
Hm... I think it's hard to classify...
Do you also want to move the e.g. ESQL logicsheet into
the XSP block? IMO that would not be a good idea.
True...hmm...ok, then whoever does it should decide :)
I see your point of placing the burden of dependencies with xsp though.
We could take that as a guideline whenever there isn't a clear reason to
do otherwise.
--
Unico
