Unico Hommes dijo:
Keep in mind that the caching system is currently in a state of flux given that we are trying to move away from Jisp. A lot of the alternatives manage the paging aspect that now involves the persistent store and store janitors themselves.
A related observation: I consider the current Jisp version unuseable for
any production site. The problem outlined here
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753 is very serious
and has forced me to use the EHCache store for some of our clients
instead (The only useable alternative besides perhaps JCS (haven't tried
to use it yet) ATM).
Good point Unico, BTW, what brakes us to make the change to JCS? It cannot be worse than Jisp or yes?
If a vote is needed to make JCS the default cache system, here is my +1.
I personally don't have enough test data to justify such a move. As I previously noted there is a problem with page flushing during shutdown but this admittedly is a minor issue compared to the mentioned Jisp bug. Regarding performance testing I think Corin can provide more info on it than me. Alternatively we could go with EHCache as a default instead. I have been using it quite successfully for the last two weeks and the license issue has been cleared up as well.
-- Unico
