Unico Hommes wrote: > > Keep in mind that the caching system is currently in a state of flux > given that we are trying to move away from Jisp. A lot of the > alternatives manage the paging aspect that now involves the persistent > store and store janitors themselves.
Thanks for the heads-up. Yes, i was bearing that in mind. There is plenty to do with the documentation anyway just to get it clear. We can then have the framework to add notes about whatever solutions we arrive at. --David
