(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of stable/unstable blocks, possibly with a clear directory hierarchy (src/blocks/stable, src/blocks/unstable), a default commented out
-1 on dir structure, cvs hastle would kinda prevent blocks of becoming stable, right?
Right (how I wish that we would switch to Subversion anytime soon...).
unstable.blocks.properties that Joe User *has* to read to compile such stuff and some more warning around...
just an idea popping up: why not reverse the default exclude.block.XXX setting for the unstable ones?
then people will need to enable those and thus be more explicitely confronted?
That is the main purpose, yes. Could be enough as a first step.
Ciao,
-- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com (Blogging at: http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)
