Tim Larson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:24:55AM +0200, Marc Portier wrote:
Hi all,
Long due, but here goes...
Over time our RepeaterBinding has been reported as behaving 'odd' and as 'not expected', in the best cases some argumentation could bend those into 'unobvious'...
The brave among us probably just patch the beast or make their own 'SimpleRepeaterBinding' and go on with their job...
Marc, could you also consider the "virtual rows" concept that is shown in the TempRepeaterBinding? You can look at the Form Model GUI to see how it is used. I do not care what it is called, and if you have a better solution I am all ears.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107810975428494&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107090208432201&w=2
--Tim Larson
thx chap, I did miss that! In fact when reading the postings I'm still missing it :-(
care to clarify or should I just hit the code?
-marc=
PS: sudden idea: widgets have recently been attribute-enabled, sounds like something we could use to hook in some 'item-identity' on the row-level (argh, or fix the row class so it can just store that member!... hm, have to think some more)
--
Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
