Marc Portier dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> I am not sure if here my DB oriented mind is strongly playing with me. >> But >> I really see the connection between both models. Maybe I am wrong, but I >> strongly believe it will be obvios in the future when people will get >> more >> in touch with JXPath. >> >> It is just an optional way to "save" typing". We can define it as: >> >> The default value of @path is @id is @path is not defined. > > I'm quite -0 but if more people like this it's easy enough > actually while reading up your other comments I have to conclude that > the only value that would be a meaningful default value for @path is "."
OK. I will not push it any more. I mean this for the <fb:value> not for the <fb:repeater>. <snip/> Yep. I was too much concentrated on Beans and JXPath and I must admit I was wrong. Now I agree with you. To summarize: repeater/@parent-path -> repeater/@path (default value "."). repeater/@row-path -> repeater/@item-path Is that correct? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
