Ok, we guess we can continue this discussion forever :) I would say, do what you think is better, we will see what happens.
Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Reinhard P�tz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULT] javaflow > > Torsten Curdt wrote: > > >>> but then I'd propose to disable *all* unstable blocks > >>> > >> > >> Oh no, please not because this will lead to everyone wanting to > >> declare his favorite block "stable" :) > > > > > > don't wanna bitch around but... if you want prevent users to use > > unstable code (or at least make them aware of the fact) we should > > handle blocks all the same. > > > > and as you see with the midi block > > ...if we can consider it stable it'll > > become marked stable. no big deal. > > > I think so too. Either all unstable blocks are disabled or noone. > > > > > I don't think "stable" has anything to do with preference > but instead > > how it has proven to be stable in production over time. > > > ... and IMO there must be more than one person willing to support it. > (of course no guarantee that it will be supported forever but > it increases the chances) > > -- > Reinhard >
