Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, we guess we can continue this discussion forever :)
I would say, do what you think is better, we will see what
happens.
+1
Carsten, I like your pragmatic approaches ;-)
Best,
Reinhard
-----Original Message-----
From: Reinhard P�tz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULT] javaflow
Torsten Curdt wrote:
but then I'd propose to disable *all* unstable blocks
Oh no, please not because this will lead to everyone wanting to
declare his favorite block "stable" :)
don't wanna bitch around but... if you want prevent users to use
unstable code (or at least make them aware of the fact) we should
handle blocks all the same.
and as you see with the midi block
...if we can consider it stable it'll
become marked stable. no big deal.
I think so too. Either all unstable blocks are disabled or noone.
I don't think "stable" has anything to do with preference
but instead
how it has proven to be stable in production over time.
... and IMO there must be more than one person willing to support it.
(of course no guarantee that it will be supported forever but
it increases the chances)
--
Reinhard
