Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > We agreed that we move to subversion as soon as possible. > > Next friday we will (hopefully) release 2.1.5, so we should > move right > > after the release. > > > > Any volunteers for doing this? > > Err... what should we actually do? > > I mean, let's say that we have decided that the format will be: > > /cocoon/ <- this is the repository > /2.0/ > /trunk/ <- trunk of 2.0 > /tags/ <- tags of 2.0 > /2.1/ > /trunk/ <- trunk of 2.1 > /tags/ <- tags of 2.1 > > IIUC we just need to ask infrastructure to run cvs2svn to the > cocoon-2.1 and cocoon-2.2 repos and put them under "cocoon" > as 2.1 and 2.2. > Yes, but even if it's just an email, someone has to write it :)
I think we should only move 2.1 to subversion and skip the 2.2 repository in the long run. Carsten
