Re: Moving to subversion - volunteers?

[Pier Fumagalli]

On 9 May 2004, at 22:15, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

We agreed that we move to subversion as soon as possible.
Next friday we will (hopefully) release 2.1.5, so we should

move right

after the release.

Any volunteers for doing this?

Err... what should we actually do?

I mean, let's say that we have decided that the format will be:

/cocoon/ <- this is the repository
   /2.0/
     /trunk/  <- trunk of 2.0
     /tags/   <- tags of 2.0
   /2.1/
     /trunk/  <- trunk of 2.1
     /tags/   <- tags of 2.1

IIUC we just need to ask infrastructure to run cvs2svn to the
cocoon-2.1 and cocoon-2.2 repos and put them under "cocoon"
as 2.1 and 2.2.

Yes, but even if it's just an email, someone has to write it :)

I think we should only move 2.1 to subversion and skip the 2.2
repository in the long run.

Yes, but don't remove that "root" 2.x version with inside a trunk and tags... it'll allow us to grow in the future (AKA, don't flatten the directory structure)...

Start with

/2.1/
        /trunk/
    /tags/

so that in the future we can add all the next releases (and we can have multiple trunks) and maybe even backport our CVS.

Pier

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature