Steven Noels wrote:
On 26 May 2004, at 10:15, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Some people here are not satisfied with our build system, and advocate Maven. I definately agree with the first part, and am, for technical but also for historical reasons, very much adverse to the second one.
Apart from the human factor, about which I learned I couldn't care less anymore,
Actually I still care about who manages the code we depend upon. I though we had learned a lesson with the forked Rhino, JISP, etc...
I'd love to hear about your specific technical quibbles with Maven.
It uses more memory, it's slower, it's not yet released, it does not (yet) work well with Forrest, it does not work with Gump, it's not as stable anb backward compatible both in design and in code as Ant is, it's not as much deployed and known as Ant, it does not yet have good IDE integration... etc etc
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------