Ugo Cei wrote:
(Note to self: rewrite unit tests so that they don't depend on BeanFactory).
yes and no:
I've seen myself do both: have tests that go on detail level and just wire beans themselves in the setup()
but also: have tests that use the beanfactory to do so (using a stupid base class that extends TestCase)
In short: I see no reason why not to have both, the latter help document typical configuration settings for the bean wiring
still have to get into your actual code sample though, by the way: could we arrange having a cvs somewhere?
regards, -marc= -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
