Re: [RT] Building ECM++ for 2.2

[Ralph Goers]

I encourage Carsten to wholeheartedly undertake this task.  I really 
only have two thoughts.
1. I don't think it is a good idea to keep the same package names for 
ECM if they are moved into Cocoon.  That could be very confusing.  I 
realize it would be a lot of work to rename existing classes that use 
those interfaces, but done on the proper release boundary I think it is 
the right thing to do.
2. JMX is the right way to go for instrumentation.

Ralph