Ralph Goers wrote: > > I encourage Carsten to wholeheartedly undertake this task. I > really only have two thoughts. > 1. I don't think it is a good idea to keep the same package > names for ECM if they are moved into Cocoon. That could be > very confusing. I realize it would be a lot of work to > rename existing classes that use those interfaces, but done > on the proper release boundary I think it is the right thing to do. The implementation will get of course the o.a.cocoon package names, so everything will be renamed. If course the marker interfaces (Serviceable etc.) will not be renamed.
Carsten
