Joerg Heinicke dijo: > On 10.11.2004 17:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-10 16:09 >> ------- >> I'm in favour of: >> >>>2. Revert the jar and live with the bug in 2.1.x. >> >> Because this bug was already present in 2.1.5, it can live in 2.1.6 as >> well. >> Those who need this bug fixed can easily upgrade this library on their >> own. We >> should do our best to provide JDK1.3 support at this moment, and after >> 2.1.6 we >> can discuss option of dropping it. > > Me too.
?? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
