David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
The news doesn't show the release of 2.1.6 and the changes page doesn't look current.Hi,
I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/
Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly?
If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi), I'll make some changes (e.g. CVS->SVN, 2.1.6->news, etc), then try to complete the publication process.
As a newbie to this, I'd appreciate confirmation that what I've done so far is okay.
TIA.
Upayavira
Okay. My request was more to do with "have I run Forrest right". I should have made that more clear.
There are two aspects.
* The person who ran the 'forrest' command would have seen the "Build Successful" note.
* Any of us can review Upayavira's staging site to see if it "looks okay".
For the latter, i just glanced at a few pages and it seems to be fine. I see from the dates in the footers, that you updated both the "top-level" site docs and the "2.1" docs ... good.
Great. But, as you said elsewhere, I need to use Cocoon's 'build docs', rather than 'forrest site', as Cocoon needs to prepare some source files for Forrest.
I did eventually see "Build successful" from Forrest, after having worked through a few validation issues.
Thanks for checking this.
Regards, Upayavira
