Le 24 nov. 04, � 12:42, Guido Casper a �crit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:Le 23 nov. 04, � 10:53, oceatoon a �crit :...Is different JS really coded for different browsers? I thought there wereyour (future) client might *not* even be a browser per se. Think Flash, XUL, and related stuff.
only those with JS and those without, in the second case validation would
go back to Server Side but no different version of scripts...
This may be a little off topic and I'm asking out of curiosity what others think. But I wonder if flow (and continuations in particular) and cforms really is an appropriate technology for "rich" (and potentially stateful) clients?
It's hard to say without having a concrete example to judge, and I have none at this time ;-)
My point was that saying "client-side validation will always be done in javascript" sounds a bit too restrictive, I' d rather say "although client-side validation will be done in javascript in 95% of the cases, we allow other options even if javascript is the standard."
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
