On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:45:27 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past we had several arguments about why logkit is better and so > on but I think most of these arguments are not valid any more. Well, AFAIU a big one still stands true: security. I really hate the idea that other code can write to my channel just by doing a Logger.getLoggerFor(). But hey, that's life... all in all syslogd has been around for quite some time and works exactly that way, so let's move on. I tend to back the UGLI logging interface ATM... but I just love Torsten's just4log suggestion as well. Yeah, something I'm still missing is the good old -DDEBUG switch... -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com
