On Apr 4, 2005 10:26 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > On 31 Mar 2005, at 01:26, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
<snip/> > > As all URI discussions tend to provoke strong feelings for Stefano, it's > best to say directly that this question is not important enough for me > to fight about ;) > > But anyway, whether we go for an opaque custom protocol or base the > block protocol on hierachial URIs we need to get into the specifics for > the block URI scheme to be able to implement it. > > WDYT? He, he... The more I look at this the more I wonder if maybe it really isn't crazy to allow blocks to specify a resolver intercept scheme. Just lift the code directly out of mod-rewrite/mod-redirect and let a block tell Cocoon what URI's have special concerns: <resolver>match spec</resolver> then you can go either way... -- Peter Hunsberger
