Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > Isn't session-fw deprecated? > > No, not yet :)
> > I think Torsten meant to move classes into session-fw because of hard > (compilation time) dependency, while *not* adding session-fw -> xsp > dependency, > which is soft (configuration only). > Yeah, but that's imho very ugly. But to be honest, I'm tired of these xsp and dependency discussions. If someone things it should be different, do it if you think that it helps our users. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
