I think that we need people that write documentation, not a tool.
I can hardly disagree more.
I wrote my blog *before* I wrote its posts. Without it, I could have written them by hand, but god, that always made me go "nah".
MDR ! This discussion is really funny. No offense guys but I feel like I see my grandparents in front of me saying "In my time, things were better, we wrote our letters by hand and then we used a typewriter to make it cleaner..."
WYSIWYG guys ! WYSIWYG ! And so many things instead of the "G" at the end can be achieved now : What You See Is What You... - Get - Structure - Meant and the closer we'll get to the "What You See Is What You THINK", the easier it will be to create any digital content. Isn't it what all the computer thing is all about ?
What we need is simplicity in the workflow.
Simplify the workflow, tuning the simplicity to those people that are more likely to write, and content will start flowing in (as the wiki shows very well).
Sebastien, this is not a funny discussion. Those who think that Word is always more productive than Latex have never written a 200 pages math book.
In short: simplicity of workflow is the goal, not WYSIWI*. WYSIWI*, if done properly, is a way to achieve it, but it has to be carefully tuned for the needs of the users we are targetting.
-- Stefano.
