Ralph Goers wrote: > > I doubt many will switch until 2.2 is stable - i.e we've had a few > releases of it. I would recommend that we continue doing maintenance on > 2.1 until at least a stable 2.2.0 is released and possibly a release or > two later. That doesn't mean that new features need to be backported to > 2.1 though. > Exactly. It took a long time until the majority updated from 2.0 to 2.1; and still there are many installations out there using 2.0.x. So we have to maintain 2.1.x for a long time. But as soon as 2.2 is final we don't have to sync the branches anymore, just for bugfixes.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
