Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's > >>the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time. > > > > > > Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it for many > > days? Like when you rename a jar but forget to update the descriptor? > > because cocoon doesn't use *all* of that data, only parts. > > Truth be told, cocoon could have two files, one for gump and one for its > own build system, but they would contain the same information. > > >>Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers > >>commit access to the cocoon project. > > > > Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants > > rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows > > file-granularity. > > Even better. Can we do it or is it something that infra@ has to do?
PMC chairs can do it. -David
