On 30 Aug 2005, at 19:06, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:Just so you know, if Cocoon Forms is still marked unstable I'll be voting -1.Does it mean Cocoon should go without release for a year? Would you still vote -1 if CForms is not marked stable after 2 years? 3?I don't get it. We should do releases *more* often, not less.
I agree wholeheartedly... My personal problem is that we don't release often enough, and in maintaining my system, too many things change from one release to another... 2.1.5 was released 2 years ago now and that's what I use on production.
There are "non-trivial" changes, they do affect a lot the performance/ functionality of my sites, so, for me to switch to current head (or latest release), I need to do a quite extensive test to see if it actually works...
So far, what I've done is that internally I "forked" 2.1.5 and back- porting certain fixes I need, that guarantees me a smooth (and well known) upgrade path...
It'd be nice to have a release every month or two, with minimal changes, so that one can easily spot what changes, and if something breaks, identify easily what needs to be fixed...
So, even if cforms are still unstable, frankly, 2.1.8 shouldn't be blocked by it at all...
Or am I the only one seeing it this way?
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
