Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I think making it pluggable is what I requested in the first place. But I wouldn't want ot assume that an XML file has nothing else in it other than properties. So I would prefer that the plug-in have the responsibility of interpreting whatever datasource it is reading.Ok, the current solution is property based (name - value pairs). If we would make this pluggable, would this work for you? For example, we could convert an XML file into properties. Carsten
Ralph
