On Friday 07 October 2005 14:15, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > so I think you're trying to put words into my mouth.
Maybe you hate him for that ;o) > Ok, now let's get back to the technical discussion... Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > But even when size is not an issue, having smaller webapps helps in > > making users perceive what core functionality the cocoon framework gives > > them and what is add-on. Indeed. An easy-to-understand "fairly simple" system with 50 plug-ins looks like a better deal to a newcomer than a big monolith, which is hard to grasp. However, to me "fatness" in distribution is somewhat moot point nowadays. I have had some concerns over the runtime RAM footprint, but have no conclusive numbers, whether it is a leak problem, or just caching going nuts. Scheduled server restarts doesn't sound like a good solution, but at the moment it is the 'cheapest' thing to do. Cheers Niclas
