On 10/14/05, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 14 oct. 05, à 15:46, Peter Hunsberger a écrit :
<snip/> > > a) move issues to jira first, set bugzilla readonly > > b) do the cleanup in jira, which will send the emails to people with > links to jira > > c) people go to jira to confirm or close the issue. > The issue includes a backlink to the old bugzilla issue (according to > Jeff Turner elsewhere in this thread, but > http://issues.apache.org/jira/ is down currently, I cannot check) in > case they want to check the info. > > Is that what you mean? Yupp, you've got it. > The only downside is that people need to create an account jira first, > before they can confirm or close their issues. But I agree that it's > good to expose people to the new system. If they care enought about the issue, then they'll need a new account at some point anyway? > I don't know if jira is as good as bugzilla for mass operations (i.e. > "set all open issues which were entered before Sept 1st to LATER / P5), > I'll check as soon as it is back. Got me... > > ...BTW personally; "bug amnesty" sounds strange, I don't think it > > really > > conveys what you are trying to achieve... > > The name's been changed to "bugzilla issues cleanup" since, see [1] > Yes, I spotted that after my first e-mail. Sounds better... -- Peter Hunsberger