Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 10.10.2005, at 21:18, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 10 oct. 05, à 20:32, Geert Josten a écrit :
> How about doing a "bug amnesty" as follows?
Good idea. Hasn't this been done before with some of the bugs?...
some, yes, but not on a large scale, which I think we need now.
mozilla did this recently, too. they had quite the controversy
around it, but it worked out in the end. more at
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2005/09/ autounco_info.html
also, +1 on the idea.
+1
Cannot remember how many times I've asked for further feedback
...and did not get any
Then we should only close the bugs marked as "INFO" and not all of them.
If the user was not able to give us more info, then close the bug. I was
thinking that not all the users fill a bug report. I wonder wich will be
the message to our user base, if we just choose a date and close
everything after that they.
It is a really that some bugs takes longer than 2 months to be fixed.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
