On 02.11.2005 10:48, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
About the logo, however, I really prefer the current one, which is way more readable and is also well-known.
And IMO it looks even more "modern" than the proposal. On 02.11.2005 11:30, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Agreed, but a new logo when we release 2.2 or 3.0 would be highly desirable from a marketing point of view. The current one is starting to show its age IMO.
A new logo should at least look similar to the current one to get recognized again - even with new versions of Cocoon. Anything else is bad from marketing POV.
On 02.11.2005 15:42, Ralph Goers wrote:
I've always wondered why the logo isn't a cocoon?
Aren't there 3 o's each cocooning a dot? Jörg
