Torsten Curdt wrote: > >>>It is a shame, but these samples never got over the loss on the xml > >>>docs that used to be distributed with Cocoon. > >>>These were what were indexed for those samples AFAIR. > >> > >>Remove them? > > > >Erk, that is bad. How about just leaving them there, > >knowing that they are broken, with a notice on the Lucene > >Samples page. Someone might be able to later add a > >specific set of example docs. > > Erk, that is even worse ;-) > > Seriously: releasing with a broken sample > does not really spread confidence in a > product.
:-) I believe that throwing the work away, just because no-one can find a bit of time to fix it, is a community destroyer. Why would people bother to contribute examples when the work gets thrown away so easily. -David
