hepabolu schrieb: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>No, I'm fine with that. I'm happy for any improvement wrt to layout and >>usability. Obviously html and css are not my core domain... :) > > > Carsten, could you go over the portal sample once again? There are still > some namespaces left in the resulting html (e.g. xmlns:java xmlns:cl etc.). > Ok, thanks, yepp, I'll clean up the code and surpress them.
> I'm not sure if that has any influence on the CSS, but it prevents valid > HTML and since we strive to adhere to standards, we might as well try > to get to valid HTML as far as possible. Yes, definitly. > > I also noted an extra 'coplet' attribute added here and there. Not sure > if it's necessary for the workings of the portlet, but if you can loose > it, please do. Can you give me a pointer where you found it? > > If I run into other quirks I'll post them. Great, yes, please do. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
