Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
As soon as forms is really called and *treated* as stable: +1
As I said previously, the number of CForms users is such that any change
will have to be backwards compatible.
I removed v2 and v3 as the (unnamed) v1 should be the official API, but
this breaks the DreamTeam sample that's using v3
We need official vote to mark CForms stable, so let's start it. Please vote to
mark CForms as stable, to be included in imminent 2.1.9 release:
[ ] +1, Let's do it!
[ ] 0, What is CForms?
[ ] -1, It's not stable, because...
I vote +1.
PS Of course, sample should be fixed before 2.1.9 is out, but this vote only
about CForms stability.
Vadim
