Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >> Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>> As soon as forms is really called and *treated* as stable: +1 >> >> >> As I said previously, the number of CForms users is such that any >> change will have to be backwards compatible. >> >> I removed v2 and v3 as the (unnamed) v1 should be the official API, >> but this breaks the DreamTeam sample that's using v3 > > > We need official vote to mark CForms stable, so let's start it. Please > vote to mark CForms as stable, to be included in imminent 2.1.9 release: > > [ ] +1, Let's do it! > [ ] 0, What is CForms? > [ ] -1, It's not stable, because...
+1 Upayavira
