-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:11:06 +0100
From: Jorg Heymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r369374 - /cocoon/trunk/pom.xml
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Just a shy question. Is this comparable to the @author tag in the sources?
According to the maven pom docs :
Developer:
Information about one of the committers on this project. Derived from
Contributor.
Contributor:
Description of a person who has contributed to the project, but who does
not have commit privileges. Usually, these contributions come in the
form of patches submitted.
I can read the Maven docs. But my question was whether we will later
have the same discussion about it as we had with the @author tag.
I just want to make sure we don't go forwards and than backwards again.
That's wasted time we can save in adance.
We can interpret this whichever we want, but i suggest we don't go too
granular with assigning developers and contributors to each module.
So we can put a [email protected] in there as well?
HTH
No, actually, it didn't help.
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzA+vLNdJvZjjVZARAvBZAKC9StAp3MqX6NA8Y4mUkse+6KwBJACeIILF
TWe5ON+fHFgibd+4y/4c6Tg=
=OSkP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
