-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ralph Goers wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:07:58 -0800
From: Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Logkit (I know, again) was [RT] Using Spring instead of ECM++
Giacomo Pati wrote:
While we are at discussing cleanups.
What about also getting rid of logkit and use what we already have in our
dependency lists (log4J, commons-logging, ...)?
I think we definitively need to get a smaller footprint and also get
committed to fewer alternatives (of which we do have too many now IMHO,
not mentioning other stuff we carry with us just because we do have them
since years).
I thought we already discussed this and made log4j the default? If that is
the proposal, I'm fine with it. If the proposal means getting rid of our
Logger abstraction layer I'm -1 on that.
If the logger abstraction you mentioned is the Avalon LogEnabled one
than yes, we will still have to support that for backward compatability.
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD8KJ6LNdJvZjjVZARAulkAJ0Td8xAWkSHgVvdBrS+QbiLy8RbuQCfdrV4
SRnldYHsPL4ohOutML/9h2k=
=zl97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
