Reinhard Poetz wrote: > I don't understand what this thread is about. We can discuss it for ages what > we > *want* to do but this doesn't necessarily mean that something will really > happen. If there is enough involvement to get 2.2 (didn't we decide to call > it > "2.3"?) out of the door it will happen, if not, nothing will happen. The same > is > true for 3.0 (= with OSGi). Personally I don't have a problem if both release > cycles start around the same point of time. > Hmm, I thought this thread is about focusing involvement to get a release out. So what is wrong about discussing a(nother) possible release plan? Some of us see the need to discuss these things, so please let them do this. If we wouldn't need further information, we could just release today - and I guess this is nothing anyone of us wants, right?
Ok, getting more constructive - I think our biggest problem *today* is the incomplete build system - we need a system which builds a running Cocoon version *including* the blocks and the samples. Imho, we should have this before the hackaton. I know we have already talked about this "for ages" and nothing happened. So are there any volunteers who have some spare time to finish the work? (As a motivation for this: if this person is comming to Dublin, I guess everyone of the Cocoon community will buy him/her a beer - or whatever drink is prefered) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
