Reinhard Poetz schrieb: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> Ok, so let's change the strategy and fix the standalone service >> selector... :) If svn works again I can do this on monday evening - if >> noone beats me to it. > > I didn't fix the StandaloneServiceSelector but replaced it with a factory. > Basically the factory works for me and the code is very simple. Exception > handling needs to be improved but that's the next step. > > Could somebody verify and review the attached patch? > I'm not sure but I think your solution is the opposite of the current problem: you are always creating a new instance, so thread safe components are not handled correctly.
I'm about to commit a fix for the selector. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
