Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > Right, but that's easily fixed (see > http://people.apache.org/~reinhard/ProcessingNodeBuilderFactory.java). I > would > prefer getting rid of the StandaloneServiceSelector as it is everything else > than a simple class for a simple task and why do all those builders need to > be > components? The StandaloneServiceSelector was really too complicated. I simplified it and it should work now. I think it can be further simplified.
> I know there are historical reasons but do we need them to be > components _now or in the future_? Don't know and don't care as long as it is working. > > Anything else that could be a problem with my implementation? > No, actually I don't care if you want to use your implementation or the new fixed version of the standalone service selector (which i renamed). I leave it up to you - all I want is a working solution. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
