Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
You *can* use the mechanisms I explained but you *don't have to*. If you want to
benefit from from *particular* advantages that OSGi brings, you have to do
something.
Ok, so we need another way :) I'll think about this in the next days. I
think without a proper solution 2.2 will be even worse than 2.1.x where
we have the nice patch tool.
We should take some time to design the configuration and give room for
discussions *before* somebody is implementing something.
As this will take some time I propose to do a a first beta release very soon
(last week of May) without configuration.
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}
web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
