Leszek Gawron wrote: > Just a few examples of what can be currently achieved only by patching: > > - tweaking store janitor > > - configuring transient store max objects > > - configuring continuations manager > These three things could be configured through properties I guess. So there shouldn't be a need for patching.
> - you won't even be able to define a new cforms widget definition > because they don't use the new service selector that allows to span > components over several files. > > While some things are trivial to fix some are not and all definitely > need some committer attention. The problem with declaring widgets in > other files is probably a year old. > Yes, I think cforms in general is the hardest bit: it's not possible for exampe to add a converter to a datatype without patching. We should definitly come up with a better configuration which does not require any patching just for adding new widgets, converters etc. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
