Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Thien wrote:

Do you expect us picking one design and you continue from there?
I did a bit of vote counting, #2 and #3 are sharing the same amount of first choice votes but #3 is ahead overall (with second choice votes). What I'll do next is to improve #3 a little and we are good to implement it. Is that ok?

fine by me

Thien,

I'm not sure if anybody has pointed you yet to the new documentation which is in some ways different to what you can find at http://cocoon.apache.org. Have a look at http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/. Especially I want to draw your attention to following things:

 - Each deployment unit has its own consistent documentation, e.g.
   http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/core-modules/core/2.2/ or
   http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/dev-docs/blocks/forms/1.0/489_1_1.html

   At the upper right corner you can find the name of the current documentation
   unit.

 - we have a main menu containing "Cocoon Core", "Subprojects", Cocoon Blocks"
   and "Maven plugins". This has to appear on each and every page as it is the
   only way to jump between documentation units.

 - The homepage currently consists of the "getting started - getting better -
   getting involved" table, the news, an overview of the main versions and
   a general explanation of what Cocoon actually is. These pieces of
   information should find their space in the new homepage design too. IMO
   the "Getting ..." table should be the eye-catcher number 1.

 - The left-hand navigation can be up to 4 levels deep.

 - Although I would like to have it, it is difficult for us to
   maintain a "breadcrump navigation" like
   Apache Cocoon > Cocoon Blocks > Cocoon Forms > [Introduction]
   as we can't auto-generate them using existing (meta) data. As long as we
   don't have a good idea of how to do it, we should avoid having one.

If you have questions, don't hesistate to ask!

--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                       web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to