Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. --------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
- Added xinha and needed stylesheets to cocoon-forms-impl - Added
sample to cocoon-forms-sample
The xinha license seems to be still the same license htmlarea used
(htmlarea license). As this license has already be used and is also
listed in the legal folder I don't see any problems concerning the
license.
Feel free to reopen if any error occur.
I haven't tested your changes but I would like to something more general.
I wonder if you have not hurried up too much with this change. Even
though Xinha is an obvious replacement for HTMLArea they are _not_ the
same projects. I think that if someone wants to switch to a new project
she should give others a few days for comments, raising concerns etc. Of
course, I think that formal vote would be overkill in this case.
It's especially valid in this case because Rice proposed to use Dojo's
editor as an alternative. I was going to raise the same issue but wanted
to do some research before so I could add some value to the discussion.
Unfortunately, I have not had enough time to do it.
Felix, all in all, I'm not against this particular change and speaking
honestly I _am_ happy that we finally moved to Xinha but I couldn't
resist commenting general practise.
Was htmlarea removed completly or is it just a styling option whether I want to
use Xinha or Htmlarea?
Without having a deprecation period I'm against a complet removal of htmlarea as
users might have their own configurations (e.g. Daisy Wiki).
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}
web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------
