Giacomo Pati wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Hmmm, does such structure and directory naming makes sense? I would
expect creation of directory
like this:
cocoon/branches/cocoon-forms-1.0.x
Putting Cocoon Forms 1.0.0 into cocoon-2.2 does not make sense because
form block wouldn't be
necessary tied to 2.2 of core.
That might be true but e.g. for the documentation we agreed to put all
blocks unter http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2 because we also can't say that
cocoon-forms-1.0.x will work with all future Cocoon releases.
When cocoon-forms-1.0.x is still compatible with e.g. Cocoon 2.3, then
we create just another branch
cocoon/branches/cocoon-2.3/cocoon-forms-1.0.x/ (though I hardly believe
that this will happen ...)
So, where to put it now! Is this in need for a vote ;-)
cocoon/branches/cocoon-2.2/cocoon-forms-1.0.x!
Vadim
